by Dr. Edgar Gabay Agustilo
Editor
Bridging the gap between those who have more in life and those who have less could overcome disadvantage as an effective change agent or catalyst for social change in Santa Catalina, specifically when it comes at improving education. Why education?
Needless to say, the most urgent problem in development is quality education and lack of access to quality education because quality education is concentrated only in urban centers leaving the rural areas marginalized.
Needless to say, the most urgent problem in development is quality education and lack of access to quality education because quality education is concentrated only in urban centers leaving the rural areas marginalized.
Yet schooling becomes the key institution in a meritocratic selection process. It performs an important role function in the development and maintenance of a modern, democratic society which in economic development means economic progress especially with regard to social stability, peace and the sum-total happiness for all.
Noneless, poverty is caused by lack of education and lack of education caused poverty. This twin problem of poverty and lack of access to quality education creates a generational stranglehold on certain people, produces an economic lag, which make it more difficult.
Noneless, poverty is caused by lack of education and lack of education caused poverty. This twin problem of poverty and lack of access to quality education creates a generational stranglehold on certain people, produces an economic lag, which make it more difficult.
The world as we know it is a changing. Managing change is one of the key to change, it is a necessary tool for development. Unless we learn how to effectively manage change, we will find ourselves managed by the changes that are as inevitable as the sun rising and sitting.
Change happens only through people. Change is necessary to managing change. Human resource is one essential ingredient for the success of an organization. In fact, the forces that have spawned globalization for the 21st Century have launched us where the imperative to compete puts premium in human resources.
In a global economy as we know it, the capability to develop depends upon our ability to provide the necessary physical and social infrastructures that would enable us to receive, diffuse, or process information into utilitarian knowledge, and thus become production bases, which is the equivalent of economic development.
If the education system such as ours renege to diffuse knowledge, a technological lag is likely to develop into an economic lag, thus making the catching-up process more difficult than it already is.
Thus, the existence of the Sta. Catalina Global Association, as an organization, to espouse change, is justified in so far as it has for its primary purpose, the development of society. We can impact on change and development because we believe in making a difference.
In the theory of functional change, Kurt Lewin (2004), developed a three-stage model of planned change, namely how to initiate, manage, and stabilize the change process, thus:
1. the change process involves learning something new, as well as discontinuing current attitudes, behaviors, or organizational practices
2. change will not occur unless there is motivation to change, which is often the most difficult part of the change process
3. people are the hub of all organizational changes whether in terms of structure, group process, reward systems, or job design, it requires individuals to change
4. resistance to change is found even when the goals of change are highly desirable,
5. and effective change requires reinforcing new behaviors, attitudes, and organizational practices.
Every Santahanon should initiate change with passion and commitment to make our town a better place to live, which is a small step in the right direction for a better future for the next generation, for survival and world relevance.
Take a look at these statistics in the last decade:
Among Filipinos, Ages 10 to 64 years old,
19% are college level or higher
32% high school level or high school graduate
30% elementary school level or elementary graduate
9% zero schooling
By 2015, the Philippine Labor Force will be 41.4 million
But only 3.4 million or 8% will have college degree or higher
This include Filipinos who will migrate
For every 1,000 entering Grade One,
439 will graduate from Grade 6
249 will graduate from Grade 6 in 9.6 years
312 will not graduate
and only 7% will have at least, 75% in Mathematics, English and Science
Thus, for every 1,000 entering Grade One,
395 will finish high school
162 will finish Basic Education in 10 years
233 will finish Basic Education in 16 years
605 will not graduate
Put in another way, only 19% from more or less 98 million Filipinos has college education. What are the effects of all these problems?
What specific implications does this have to our local Sta. Catalina town?
ReplyDeleteKnowing the national statistics let us apply this to Sta. Catalina setting.
We cannot afford to have a census of our own or is there an existing 2010 Census of Sta. Catalina particularly on the education of tour people?
Take that as the basis and make a plan.
How many Sta. kids enter grade one in the school year 2011-2012.
Say, make a goal of improving the education attainment by 2% in a 5 year plan.
By the time 20 years from now Sta. will produce 20% more educated citizens which when to translated to development will be 20% more richer and even if they go out of the country for employment will have a better earning power which will increase the financial condition of the people for they will send money to their parents and relatives back home.
On the other characteristics of rich countries the industriousness, respect, attitude, we have to have a research on that too now, and start emphasizing it to our kindergarten kids up to high school kids so that will be part of their growing up.
Everybody should have that as the goal in all grade levels and evaluated at the end of every school year.
Every year at the beginning of the school a survey has to be conducted by everybody, anything that is less that the average every teacher will work that as their goal to raise the standard up at least 5% every year until everybody takes that as a way of life.
I know we cannot enforce our value system to everybody but this value system is for the good of everybody, everybody must buy into it to be effective otherwise it will be bull.....
Attitude towards education must be first of all the objective of each Sta. family, with the encouragement of the local government.
Children in the streets when school is in progress a city official should be in the street on the lookout for kids who should be in the classroom.
The town government should have a guidance counselor talking to parents of students who are truant.
Also true for high school kids. We want to improve the number of 6 grade and high school graduates.
When the hunger for education is in the individual they will find a way to go to college to satisfy that hunger.
-Napoleon Ambayon-
Thank you for your invaluable comment, Napoleon Ambayon.
ReplyDeleteIn the Philippines, an important part of income inequality is associated with the wage difference between the less educated and the better educated.
Education is the single most important factor that contributes to wage differentials.
At the national level, education accounts for about 30 percent of the difference in wages.
It accounts for a higher percentage of the difference for female workers (37 percent) than male workers (24 percent).
There are also differences across regions and sectors.
The majority of the least educated are employed in low-paid services jobs and the agricultural sector.
As an economy develops, the demand for skills increases.
Efforts to improve education to increase the supply of highly educated people are important not only for long-term growth, but also for helping to translate growth into more equal opportunities for the children of the current generation.
Tertiary education is to a large extent a prerequisite for high-paid occupations.
Using the Labor Force Survey 2003-2007 alone, the disparities in human capital endowment, returns to education, and the role of education in wage differentials in the Philippines, the empirical results show that returns to education monotonically increase more than those with no education:
- workers with elementary education, 10%
- secondary education, 40%
- tertiary education,100%
(The Editor)